Highlight Of Last Week

Search This Website

Tuesday, 7 January 2020

Khalji Dynasty (1290 -1320 AD)



Khalji Dynasty (1290 -1320 AD)




1290 AD The Khalji revolution had many far-reaching consequences. The most important among them was the establishment of the Khalji Empire in place of the Itwari Turks. Balban deprived the sons of Sultan Nasiruddin to retain his dynasty. With this state change, Balban proved that the Sultan's position is not only hereditary, in order to become a Sultan, his own power and the support of the commander and the rich is also necessary. The Khalji dynasty did not have the blood of royal Turks. They are considered proletarian. The proletarian Khalji dynasty overthrew the imperial Turks and gained the throne of Delhi with the support of the army and the rich. In history, it was a mad revolution and Indian revolution was also supported in this revolution. By the way, descent change was not a new phenomenon for Indians. Jalaluddin, the founder of the Khalji dynasty, received the throne of Delhi with the support of the army and the support of the rich and he retained the rule in his hands for six years by his power. This significantly changed the ethnic character of the ruling class. Jalaluddin did not remove the Turkish rich from the higher items, but he definitely reduced the importance of the Turkish rich by appointing his supporters in important positions of the state.




Also read: Alauddin Khalji

Who was the Khalsi?

KS Lal says that the citizens of Delhi, Jalaluddin







He was dissatisfied with the ascension. Contemporary writer Jiahuddin Barani writes that the sound of the Delhi high-class and shy people, the sound of congratulations, did not welcome Jalaluddin's ascension. Naveen Sultan was also familiar with his stance. That is why he was able to enter the river for a long period and got his ascent in the palace of Ghari. The Emir of Delhi was angry with his sitting on his side because they did not consider him to be Turk and the caste feeling was very strong in him. Now the question arises that who was Khalji?

This question remains controversial even today. some

Historians consider them Turks and some consider them Afghans. Ziauddin Barni was a historian of that time. Therefore, his mention should be very reliable. He has written that Khalji was thin with the Turks, but he did not attempt to tell who they were, "he writes," When Kekubad was seriously ill and did not expect to be well, Vlan's Officers gathered and decided to run the administration by a committee of patrons, enthroning an under-privileged son of Muizuddin so that the power of the Turks would not be taken away. Gay writes - Since Jalaluddin belonged to the Thin caste he did not believe 'nor did the Turks have any faith in the Khaljis. It is clear that the first ruler of the Khalji dynasty was not Jalaluddin Turk. Barani also writes that Khalji Differed from the Turks. But he does not explain which caste they belonged to. In later historians, Nizamuddin considers him an Afghan and says that he, along with Muhammad Ghori, India He came and was a descendant of Genghis Khan's son-in-law, Kuli Khan. He writes, Kuli Khan's relationship with his wife is not good, but he was not courageous enough to ostracize his flock's father, the Mongol emperor. Finally, he found the opportunity to take off his allegiance to Genghis Khan, while the mother-in-law of his family and followers, who numbered about 30,000, were in the valleys of Zuristan. Switch to moved. He lived there peacefully and his people started calling him as Kulij. But later the word changed to Khalbi due to continued use. When the Peacock rulers conquered India, Khalji came with them to India in large numbers and got jobs under the Sultans of India. Sultan Jalaluddin of Delhi and Mahmud ruler of Malwa in Dum Khaljiriyas. But Nizamuddin's statement cannot be considered credible, because he himself wrote at one place that the Khalji people fought with Khwarismshahi forces. It is clear that they were present in India only from Genghis Khan. It is also supported by the angel. He writes that Nakhmi's predecessor Khsjis are frequently mentioned in history, but Agai supports Nizamuddin's statement, writing, Kunlikhan himself ho Khalji clan for Rs. And Jalaluddin of Delhi and Mahmud of Malwa are his direct descendants, 'Badayuni does not agree with this statement. He says that in fact there is no relation between Kralij and Khalla. Therefore, it is baseless to assume the origin of the Khalji dynasty from the Kalies.

Hajiubir relates the Khaljiryo of Malwa to Kralijkhan, the son of Akrasiyab, the son-in-law of Genghis Khan, 1, but does not tell him about the dynasty of Jalaluddin of Delhi.

No comments:

Post a Comment